Jesper De Jong vs Clement Chidekh Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
J. De Jong vs C. Chidekh

Jesper De Jong
NED
w
w
l
w
w
l
l
l
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
25
Age
24
5'11" (180 cm)
Height
-
77
C. Rank
251
77
Best Rank
184
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$1.1M
Career Money
$14.0K
Right-Handed
Plays
-

Clement Chidekh
FRA
l
w
w
l
w
w
l
w
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
25
Age
24
5'11" (180 cm)
Height
-
77
C. Rank
251
77
Best Rank
184
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$1.1M
Career Money
$14.0K
Right-Handed
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Jong 1 - 0 Chidekh
They have played 3 sets in total, with Jesper De Jong winning 2 and Clement Chidekh winning 1. The last match between Jesper De Jong and Clement Chidekh was at the M25 Loule, 03-03-2023, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Jesper De Jong getting the victory 6-7(4) 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jong | 1 |
| Chidekh | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) M25 Loule(03-03-23)
Jesper De Jong
6
6
6
Clement Chidekh
7
4
4
J. D. Jong vs C. Chidekh H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $1,079,930 | Career Prize Money | $13,980 |
| 61.80% (288-178) | Career Total W/L | 65.20% (193-103) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 7 | Titles | 12 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 54.84% (17-14) | YTD Win/Loss | 0.00% (0-1) |
J. D. Jong vs C. Chidekh Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jesper De Jong has won 47.02% of points on their second serve, while Clement Chidekh has won 42.93%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jesper De Jong, in recent form, has won 44.56% of their opponent's second serve points, while Clement Chidekh has won 45.41%. The same stats for first serve returns are 22.45% and 29.05% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Jesper De Jong has saved 61.64% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Clement Chidekh has saved 56.74% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Jesper De Jong has won 53.03% of matches played (W/L 35/31), with Clement Chidekh winning 56.79% (W/L 46/35) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Jesper De Jong has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 94/47), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 6/12). Clement Chidekh has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 98/44), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/2).
- Player level: In the last year, Jesper De Jong has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 53.85% of matches (W/L 14/12), where as Clement Chidekh has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50.00% of matches (W/L 21/21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Jesper De Jong winning 1 times and Clement Chidekh being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Jesper De Jong winning 2 and Clement Chidekh winning 1.
- The last match between Jesper De Jong and Clement Chidekh was at the M25 Loule, 03-03-2023, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Jesper De Jong getting the victory 6-7(4) 6-4 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 3:3:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jesper De Jong has played against opponents with an average rank of 145.3 while Clement Chidekh has played against players with an average rank of 364.56.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jesper De Jong has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Clement Chidekh has won 45% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Jesper De Jong has converted 33.79% of breakpoint opportunities, and Clement Chidekh has converted 32.97% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Jesper De Jong vs Clement Chidekh Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. D. Jong vs C. Chidekh H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 18 | Games Won | 15 |
| 9 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 3:3:0 | Average Match Time | 3:3:0 |
| 72% (87/121) | 1st Serve % | 61% (70/114) |
| 70% (61/87) | 1st Serve Win % | 54% (38/70) |
| 38% (13/34) | 2nd Serve Win % | 59% (26/44) |
| 33% (5/15) | Break Pts Won % | 30% (3/10) |
| 44% (50/114) | Return Points Win % | 39% (47/121) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Jong 51%, Chidekh 50%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Jong 49%, Chidekh 54%.
Break Points Saved %: Jong 58%, Chidekh 62%.
J. D. Jong Recent Matches Played
C. Chidekh Recent Matches Played

J. D. Jong vs C. Chidekh Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61.80% (288/178) | YTD Win/Loss | 65.20% (193/103) |
| 59.46% (641/437) | Sets Win/Loss | 62.39% (423/255) |
| 54.13% (5567/4717) | Games Win/Loss | 55.03% (3426/2800) |
| 66.67% (94/47) | Hard Win/Loss | 69.01% (98/44) |
| 64.45% (165/91) | Clay Win/Loss | 43.75% (7/9) |
| 45.10% (23/28) | Indoor Hard W/L | 64.44% (87/48) |
| 33.33% (6/12) | Grass Win/Loss | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 0.4 | Aces Per Game | 0.22 |
| 2012 | Aces Total | 671 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.3 |
| 1225 | Total Double Faults | 913 |
| 1:41:13 | Average Match Time | 1:35:6 |
| 382.02 | Average Opponent Rank | 416.95 |
| 60% (19117/31871) | 1st Serve % | 62% (11669/18812) |
| 70% (13467/19117) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (7852/11669) |
| 51% (6492/12754) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (3684/7143) |
| 42% (1419/3373) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (1015/2211) |
| 41% (13212/32228) | Return Points Win % | 43% (8368/19447) |
| 60.98% (25/16) | Slam W/L | 40.00% (2/3) |
| 53.85% (7/6) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 47.92% (23/25) | Main Tour W/L | 44.44% (4/5) |
| 60.48% (127/83) | Challenger W/L | 52.58% (51/46) |
| 69.08% (105/47) | Futures W/L | 73.51% (136/49) |
| 62% (274/442) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 65% (189/291) |
| 50% (6/12) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 52% (87/168) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (32/64) |
| 53% (74/139) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (49/89) |
| 88% (281/247) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (190/172) |
| 12% (281/34) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (190/18) |
| 21% (185/39) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (106/20) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
06:00 AM 13/11/25
PredictionW1
3.2
W2
1.29
09:30 PM 12/11/25
PredictionW1
2.03
W2
1.68
02:30 AM 13/11/25
PredictionW1
1.069
W2
6.55
08:00 PM 13/11/25
PredictionW1
2.76
W2
1.38
08:30 PM 12/11/25
PredictionW1
1.83
W2
1.85
01:30 AM 13/11/25
PredictionW1
3.08
W2
1.31
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips
12 Nov 2025
Gustavo Heide vs Emilio Nava Prediction – ATP Montevideo Challenger – 12th November 2025 Best Bets
12 Nov 2025
Jan-Lennard Struff vs Mark Lajal Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 12th November 2025 Best Bets
12 Nov 2025
Ben Shelton vs Felix Auger Aliassime Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 12th November 2025 Best Bets
12 Nov 2025
Laslo Djere vs Tom Paris Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 12th November 2025 Best Bets
11 Nov 2025
Sebastian Baez vs Alvaro Guillen Meza Prediction – ATP Montevideo Challenger – 12th November 2025 Best Bets
11 Nov 2025
Lorenzo Musetti vs Alex De Minaur Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 11th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
12:00
H2H 5-5
22:30
H2H 5-4
H2H 7-1
13:30
H2H 6-1
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Kobe Challenger
Japan
Lyon Challenger
France
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
M15 Azul
Argentina
M15 Criciuma
Brazil
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Orlando
United States
M15 San Gregorio di Catania
Italy
M25 Columbus
United States
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico
M25 Monastir
Tunisia