Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jesper De Jong vs Clement Chidekh Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Jong vs Chidekh analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On The P1 vs P2 Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
:Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Jesper De Jong vs Clement Chidekh Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Jong 1 - 0 Chidekh
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jong has won 49.71% of points on their second serve, while Chidekh has won 50.73%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jong, in recent form, has won 50.62% of their opponent's second serve points, while Chidekh has won 57.36%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.26% and 34.96% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Jong has saved 62.16% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Chidekh has saved 59.13% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Jong has won 63.33% of matches played (W/L 38/ 22), with Chidekh winning 68.57% (W/L 48/ 22) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Jong has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 80/ 37), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 4/ 7). Chidekh has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 71% (W/L 60/ 24), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Jong has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 65.79% of matches (W/L 25/ 13), where as Chidekh has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 73.68% of matches (W/L 28/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Jong winning 1 times and Chidekh being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Jong winning 2 and Chidekh winning 1. The last match between Jong and Chidekh was at the M25 Loule, 03-03-2023, Quarterfinals, Hard with Jesper De Jong getting the victory 6-7(4) 6-4 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 3:3:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Jong and Chidekh have played a deciding set 1 times, with Jong winning 1 times and Chidekh 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Jong winning 0, and Chidekh 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jong has played against opponents with an average rank of 314.33 while Chidekh has played against players with an average rank of 303.17.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jong has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Chidekh has won 75% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Jong has converted 46.62% of breakpoint opportunities, and Chidekh has converted 51.4% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
119
Rank
119
High
24
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
274
Rank
265
High
23
Age
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
63% (232-137)
Career Total W/L
68% (121-56)
64% (28-16)
YTD W/L
73% (38-14)
$430,415
Career Prize Money
$6,035
1
YTD Titles
3
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Jesper De Jong vs Clement Chidekh For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Jong VS Chidekh
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
| stats | Jesper De Jong | Clement Chidekh |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 18 | 15 |
| Aces (Total) | 9 | 3 |
| DFs Total | 5 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 3:3:0 | 3:3:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 72% (87/121) | 61% (70/114) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 70% (61/87) | 54% (38/70) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 38% (13/34) | 59% (26/44) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (5/15) | 30% (3/10) |
| Return Points W% | 44% (50/114) | 39% (47/121) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(4) 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Jesper De Jong
Player
Clement Chidekh
72%
(
87 of
121)
1st Serve %
61%
(
70 of
114)
9
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
70%
(
61 of
87)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
38 of
70)
38%
(
13 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
47 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
50 of
114)
124
Total Points Won
111
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jesper De Jong | Clement Chidekh |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 64% (28/16) | 73% (38/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 59% (64/44) | 65% (79/43) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (556/475) | 55% (611/496) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 70% (7/3) | 100% (3/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 67% (20/10) | 54% (7/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) | 82% (27/6) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 33% (1/2) |
| Aces pg | 0.47 | 0.21 |
| Aces Total | 237 | 116 |
| DFs per game | 0.26 | 0.3 |
| DFs Total | 130 | 161 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:55:36 | 1:40:25 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 298.91 | 317.15 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (1924/3304) | 61% (2121/3483) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (1389/1924) | 68% (1438/2121) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (686/1380) | 51% (691/1362) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (145/311) | 51% (202/393) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (1304/3245) | 44% (1566/3578) |
| Slam W/L | 75% (9/3) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 64% (18/10) | 73% (19/7) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 79% (19/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 63% (24/38) | 73% (37/51) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 60% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 56% (9/16) | 36% (4/11) |
| Deciding Set W% | 54% (7/13) | 79% (15/19) |
| 1st set W, W | 96% (24/23) | 94% (33/31) |
| 1st set W, L | 4% (24/1) | 6% (33/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (20/5) | 37% (19/7) |
Jesper De Jong Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Jesper De Jong
54%
(
69 of
127)
1st Serve %
55%
(
67 of
122)
9
Aces
14
10
Double Faults
7
81%
(
56 of
69)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
53 of
67)
45%
(
26 of
58)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
35%
(
45 of
127)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
43 of
122)
125
Total Points Won
124
|
7-6(3) 4-6 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Denis Kudla
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Daniel Altmaier
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve %
66%
(
42 of
64)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Martin Klizan
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
52%
(
34 of
66)
17
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
88%
(
36 of
41)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
23%
(
14 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
78
Total Points Won
49
|
4-6 6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Alexander Weis
48%
(
42 of
88)
1st Serve %
58%
(
48 of
83)
5
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
52%
(
24 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
83)
89
Total Points Won
82
|
5-7 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Ignacio Buse
55%
(
47 of
86)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
35%
(
30 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
83)
89
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Alexandre Muller
47%
(
28 of
59)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Laslo Djere
Player
Jesper De Jong
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Riccardo Bonadio
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve %
75%
(
69 of
92)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
81%
(
39 of
48)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
42 of
69)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
92)
85
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carlos Alcaraz
Player
Jesper De Jong
70%
(
78 of
112)
1st Serve %
58%
(
72 of
124)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
40 of
72)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
40%
(
45 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
61 of
124)
128
Total Points Won
108
|
6-3 6-4 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Clement Chidekh Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Clement Chidekh
Player
Jie Cui
46%
(
11 of
24)
1st Serve %
61%
(
20 of
33)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
9 of
11)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
7 of
24)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
37
Total Points Won
20
|
6-1 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Clement Chidekh
Player
Louis Dussin
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
75)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
47%
(
37 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
74
|
1-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clement Chidekh
Player
Alejo Sanchez Quilez
52%
(
34 of
65)
1st Serve %
49%
(
37 of
75)
4
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
2
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Clement Chidekh
74%
(
70 of
94)
1st Serve %
68%
(
67 of
99)
9
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
10
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
44 of
67)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
38%
(
36 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
99)
98
Total Points Won
95
|
2-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Clement Chidekh
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve %
63%
(
26 of
41)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
51
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Clement Chidekh
Player
Blake Mott
54%
(
35 of
65)
1st Serve %
70%
(
54 of
77)
2
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
9
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
37 of
54)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
75
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Clement Chidekh
41%
(
17 of
41)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
5
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
76%
(
13 of
17)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marco Cecchinato
Player
Clement Chidekh
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Clement Chidekh
Player
Anas Bennour Dit Sahli
54%
(
43 of
79)
1st Serve %
43%
(
30 of
69)
0
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
14
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
11 of
39)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
31 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
39 of
69)
87
Total Points Won
61
|
6-0 5-7 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Toby Alex Kodat
Player
Clement Chidekh
51%
(
40 of
79)
1st Serve %
52%
(
38 of
73)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
7
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
33 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
73)
83
Total Points Won
69
|
6-2 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Jong Vs Chidekh Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Jong are available here and Chidekh photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
